hi ive had a complete borrowed quantity of14,575 from QQ between may 2009- mar 2011. over this duration we reimbursed a complete of3148 in interest over this era. I have all my statements from QQ everything that is stating had compensated. Will quick quid spend me personally straight straight straight straight back when it comes to loans being over 6 yrs . old or have actually no chance was got by me of seeing the older loans refunded?
be therefore grateful for the assistance? if anybody has any experience that is past loans over 6 yrs . old.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
Hi Brad, the Financial Ombudsman solution is attempting to choose whether or not to view loans over 6 yrs old and these situations are on hold until it can. You will need to get your plaint into QQ asap and then have it to the FOS after 8 days precisely – then if the FOS decides it can’t glance at the older loans, you are going to nevertheless have up to feasible within time.
many many thanks Sara. We decided to go to qq from the 23/8/16 so its just been a couple of weeks up to now. must I get right to the ombudsman now or watch for their 8 response week. im worried im likely to lose out on the1000s before the 6 mark year. Perhaps you have heard about the ombudsman having to pay on loans avove the age of 6 years or they simply frozen until they determine what to complete?
appreciat your assistance. many thanks, Brad
additionally we nevertheless have1200 outstanding I owe with them which
My plaint with QQ got passed away to an adjudicator whom ntacted me personally from the 7th of September seeking my bank statements, credit history and I was in financial difficulty if I had ever told QQ. They provided me with a due date to respond with all the details by 14th September. Are you aware out it’ll delay my case even more if they put the same deadlines to QQ and, if so, does that mean that if QQ drag it?
Additionally, does anybody have rough concept of exactly how long it requires for the adjudicator to help make a choice? It is now almost a few months since We first plained to QQ therefore it’s actually needs to drag down 🙁
Fast Quid get back again to Adjudicator suggesting they don’t have actually to inquire about nsumer for expenditure just before 2014. And they shall perhaps maybe maybe not refund any such thing. also adjudicator ruled in my own benefit asking them to settle all interest and 8% returning to 2010. simply interest es to over 10K. maybe perhaps maybe not certain that this might be one of several strategies employed by Quick quid to drag it longer.
quickinstallmentloans.com/payday-loans-wy
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
“don’t have actually to inquire of for spending prior to 2014” this argument is comparable to a payday lender saying they didn’t need certainly to credit check you before 2014 that I penned this short article about: s:debtcamel../payday-loan-credit-sres/. It’s theoretically real BUT in the event that you ntinued to borrow from their website thirty days after thirty days (which for you personally appears as if it absolutely was for many years) then QQ needs to have taken acunt of the, realized that you’re influenced by these loans and stopped lending. Or of urse they uld have expected one to offer information regarding your ine and spending because they don’t have to do something doesn’t mean they uldn’t do it and this would have been something a responsible lender should have nsidered if they were worried – just.
A loan provider needs to just take acunt of whatever they knew. Then they uldn’t take acunt of that BUT they did know that you were repeatedly borrowing from them suggesting the loans were unaffordable if they didn’t know your expenditure. Plus they ignored this.
It appears as if that is a really good situation to decide to try the Ombudsman.
Many Many Thanks Sara, i am going to wait till reaction from adjudicator as she’s going to need to glance at point raised by fast quid then inform me her reaction. I am hoping adjudicator don’t alter her initial choice and stuck to her initial report. I’m concerned now that she might alter her initial decision.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
If she does (and ideally she won’t since this is not actually a significant argument from QQ) then e straight back right here as (a) you can easily talk about it because of the adjudicator and (b) escalate to the Ombudsman degree if required.